meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
app:using_analogtest [2022/03/02 14:53] – [Drive Analog Characteristics] wordsmithing flan | app:using_analogtest [2022/03/02 15:02] – [What do all these graphs mean?] Added a bit more explanation. flan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=== Noise === | === Noise === | ||
- | The *Noise* test in the lower left gives us a baseline for the density of noise that is generated by the drive when in "full panic" mode. Having a high noise level here **doesn' | + | The Noise test in the lower left gives us a baseline for the density of noise that is generated by the drive when in "full panic" mode. Having a high noise level here **doesn' |
=== Window Stability === | === Window Stability === | ||
- | The *Window Stability* graph at the top of the window is the analysis of what the drive can and cannot process reliably. The gray vertical lines show the results for individual tests at various flux frequencies long lines are high success rate, and short or no line means lower success rate. The gold line in the graph is a breakdown of the signal reliability along with factoring in things like spindle motor speed fluctuations and such. The most important thing you need to recognize in this graph is the durations which are covered with the gold line pinned to the top which is 100% reliability. The above graph shows that the signal is 100% stable from 3.75µs through to 19µs. If you aren't familiar with how data is stored on disks at a very low level, then that range of stability probably means absolutely nothing to you. And as an expert in this, I could give you the definitive answer of "well, it depends on what kind of disks you want to be imaging" | + | The Window Stability graph at the top of the window is the analysis of what the drive can and cannot process reliably. The gray vertical lines show the results for individual tests at various flux frequencies long lines are high success rate, and short or no line means lower success rate. The gold line in the graph is a breakdown of the signal reliability along with factoring in things like spindle motor speed fluctuations and such. The most important thing you need to recognize in this graph is the durations which are covered with the gold line pinned to the top which is 100% reliability. The above graph shows that the signal is 100% stable from 3.75µs through to 19µs. If you aren't familiar with how data is stored on disks at a very low level, then that range of stability probably means absolutely nothing to you. And as an expert in this, I could give you the definitive answer of "well, it depends on what kind of disks you want to be imaging" |
^ Media ^ Encoding ^ Platform ^ 100% Stability Required ^ | ^ Media ^ Encoding ^ Platform ^ 100% Stability Required ^ | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
=== First Injection Timing === | === First Injection Timing === | ||
- | The *First Injection Timing* graph is a bit more complex to explain and for the most part is irrelevant to most users. If you really want to know, there is some details about what it is showing in the last section of this page. | + | The First Injection Timing graph is a bit more complex to explain and for the most part is irrelevant to most users. If you really want to know, there is some details about what it is showing in the last section of this page. |
---- | ---- |